Legislation roundup: Equity investment, Cryptography Law and online crimes
October 31, 2019 | BY
Susan MokNon-investment type FIEs are allowed to use their investment capital in equity investment, foreign investment in commercial cryptography will receive equal treatment and leakage of user information as a result of failure in cybersecurity management obligations may be criminal.
Foreign Exchange
State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Circular on Further Promoting Convenience in Cross-Border Trade and Investment
Provided that they do not violate the current Special Administrative Measures for Foreign Investment Access (Negative List) and that domestic projects invested in by them are genuine and compliant, non-investment type foreign-invested enterprises shall be permitted, in accordance with the law and on the basis of investment-type foreign-invested enterprises (including foreign-invested companies with an investment nature, foreign-invested venture capital firms and foreign-invested equity investment enterprises) being permitted to engage in domestic equity investments using their investment capital in accordance with laws and regulations.
Further reading
PRC Cryptography Law
Governments at every level and relevant departments thereof shall abide by the principle of non-discrimination in treating commercial cryptography research and development, production, sales, servicing and import-export entities, including foreign-invested enterprises, equally in accordance with the law. The state encourages, in the course of foreign investment, cooperation in commercial encryption technologies carried out based on the principle of free will and business rules.
See the full translation.
Further reading
Cybersecurity
Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate, Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Unlawful Use of Information Networks, Assisting Criminal Activities Over Information Networks, Etc.
Where performance of information network security management obligations is refused, resulting in the leakage of user information, and any of the following circumstances applies, the same shall be found to have caused a serious consequence as specified in Article 286 of the Criminal Law:
(1) results in the leakage of at least 500 pieces of information on whereabouts, content of communications, credit information or property information; or
(2) results in the leakage of at least 5,000 pieces of other user information that could affect safety of the person or property, such as accommodation information, communications records, health and physiological information and trading information.
See the full translation.
Further reading
This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.
A Premium Subscription Provides:
- A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
- A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
- Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
Already a subscriber? Log In Now