Winning the War to Rein in China's Wealth Management Products

July 18, 2019 | BY

Marilyn Romero

Reducing the risks posed by China's $4 trillion wealth management products sector is a key objective for regulators, but it needs to be at a pace that exposed banks can weather.

At the beginning of July this year, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, or CBIRC, announced that it is planning to further tighten rules on the country's huge wealth management products (WMPs) sector. China's WMPs are estimated to value Rmb21 trillion, or $3.09 trillion, at the end of June, of which about 70% are now invested in standardized assets such as bonds, deposits and money market instruments, according to the CBIRC.

In its online statement, the regulator said WMPs should now be managed based on their net value, and banks should standardize the management of their fund pools to prevent shadow banking risk. WMPs have been popular with retail investors. They are issued by banks, lending them respectability, and typically offer yields of 2% to 5%, compared with 1.5% on one-year bank deposits. Demand for WMPs was also boosted as alternative palatable investment options became more limited as a result of poorly performing stock markets and tighter restraints on moving money out of China were introduced.

But like mortgage-backed securities in the U.S. prior to the 2008 financial crisis, WMPs became key building blocks of a vast shadow-banking system that existed largely off banks' balance sheets. The estimated $4.4 trillion market that resulted became a major source of concern to regulators over the grave systemic risk it poses to financial markets and the economy.

China's banks got into the wealth management business in 2002, but the market really took off in 2009, experiencing explosive growth until 2015. As a result, it caught the government's attention because it much of it fell outside the oversight of financial regulators. Although WMPs were often issued by large banks, and perceived as secure by investors as a result, the underlying assets were often high risk investments such as property developments, and they were generally kept off balance sheet.

According to the South China Morning Post, in 2016 the market hit about $28 trillion, with about an average of 3,700 WMPs being issued each week in the first half of that year. At the time, only one product issued by a domestic bank had reported any form of loss according to Fitch. But soon after, default rates picked up. In one case in 2017, the underlying assets of WMPs sold at a branch of Minsheng Bank were found not to exist.

To combat the growing threat, Chinese regulators introduced measures to bring such products under greater oversight; introducing measures to make them less competitive compared to better-regulated alternatives; slowly opening the market to foreign competition and expertise; and opening up access to better regulated investment opportunities for such products to tap into. Such changes needed to be introduced gradually given the market's size, to allow banks time to absorb the shocks of deflating the market.

In early 2017, WMDs were required to be included on banks' balance sheets. In December last year, the CBIRC instituted the final version of long-awaited rules covering commercial banks' asset management subsidiaries, allowing these units to invest in public stock funds and invest up to 35% of their total assets under management in nonstandard credit assets. The CBIRC's new rules supplemented China central bank's overarching guidelines aimed at tightening supervision of the $15 trillion of asset management products that have been issued by banks, trust firms, insurance asset management companies, securities firms, funds and futures companies.

Most recently, the CBIRC has said that it is planning to tighten rules on cash management products (CMP), which accounted for about 60% of the outstanding WMP products in June 2018, according to a Bloomberg report. China's CMPs, which are sold by asset managers, involve an estimated $2 trillion of investments and the regulator wants to impose stricter rules on pricing; and to restrict where – and for how long – the inflows can be invested.

Currently, the looser regulation of CMPs enables banks to offer higher yields than those on better-regulated money market funds (MMFs) and the CBIRC's proposed changes could, if implemented, lessen their investment appeal, Bloomberg sources suggested. MMFs, overseen by the securities regulator, cap the duration of their investments at an average 120 days while no limit is presently applied to CMPs.

The move is unlikely to be the last by China's financial regulators as they try to rein in the risks of the country's mountain of debt held in WMDs. With a slowing and changing economy, it is likely to be a delicate balancing act with little room for error.

This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.

  • A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
  • A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
  • Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact our experienced Sales Professionals at +44 (0)203 868 7546 or [email protected]