Supreme People's Court, Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Intellectual Property Tribunal
最高人民法院关于知识产权法庭若干问题的规定
January 16, 2019 | BY
Susan MokAn IP tribunal is set up to hear complex IP cases
Promulgated: December 27, 2018
Effective: January 1, 2019
Main contents: The Supreme People's Court has established an intellectual property tribunal mainly to try intellectual property appellate cases in which the specialized technical nature is relatively strong, such as for patents.
The intellectual property tribunal is a permanent adjudication institution assigned by the Supreme People's Court, and is established in Beijing.
The judgments, rulings, written mediation statements and decisions rendered by the intellectual property tribunal are judgments, rulings, written mediation statements and decisions of the Supreme People's Court (Article 1).
The intellectual property tribunal shall hear the following types of cases:
(1) appeals where a party is dissatisfied with a judgment or ruling concerning an invention patent, utility model patent, new plant variety, integrated circuit layout design, technical secret, computer software or first instance civil monopoly case rendered by a higher people's court, intellectual property court or intermediate people's court;
(2) appeals where a party is dissatisfied with a judgment or ruling in a first instance administrative case concerning the granting or confirmation of rights in an invention patent, utility model patent, design patent, new plant variety or integrated circuit layout design rendered by the Beijing Intellectual Property Court;
(3) appeals where a party is dissatisfied with a judgment or ruling in a first instance administrative case concerning an invention patent, utility model patent, design patent, new plant variety, integrated circuit layout design, technical secret, computer software, administrative monopoly penalty, etc. rendered by a higher people's court, intellectual property court or intermediate people's court;
(4) first instance civil and administrative cases mentioned in Items (1), (2) and (3) that are major and complex nationwide;
(5) applications for retrials in accordance with the law, prosecutorial protests, retrials, etc., to which the adjudication supervision procedure applies, in respect of judgments, rulings or written mediation statements in first instance cases mentioned in Items (1), (2) and (3) of this Article that have entered into legal effect; and
(6) first instance cases mentioned in Items (1), (2) and (3) of this Article involving a dispute over jurisdiction, applications for reconsideration of fine or detention decisions, referrals for extension of the time limit for concluding a trial, etc. (Article 2).
Related legislation: Provisions on Jurisdiction in Cases of the Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou Intellectual Property Courts, 2014
clp reference:5100/18.12.27 promulgated:2018-12-27 effective:2019-01-01This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.
A Premium Subscription Provides:
- A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
- A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
- Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
Already a subscriber? Log In Now