Chinese vitamin C makers off the hook for U.S. antitrust violations

October 19, 2016 | BY

Katherine Jo

Following a dismissal by a U.S. appeals court of a $147 million price-fixing judgment, Chinese lawyers say that the my-government-made-me-do-it antitrust defense may not work next time for PRC companies

Last month, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated a $147 million lower court verdict and freed a Chinese pharmaceutical maker from U.S. antitrust liability for price-fixing on the basis of international comity.

While the decision might have been a disappointment to many in the United States, it was hailed in China as a victorious ending to a 12-year-long litigation marathon. State-run news agency Xinhua said, quoting a local legal official in the northern Hebei province, that the case could set an example for other Chinese exporters facing similar antitrust allegations in the U.S. And DeHeng Law Offices, the Beijing-based law firm that served as Chinese counsel for defendants-appellants Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and its parent, North China Pharmaceutical Group Corp., said in a statement that “this victory has the significance of a milestone to Chinese companies in their dealings with cross-border litigation.”

But that significance exists only in theory; in reality, the practical impact this case has on today's Chinese companies will be minimal.

This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.

  • A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
  • A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
  • Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact our experienced Sales Professionals at +44 (0)203 868 7546 or ChinaLawPracticeSubs@alm.com