Clarifying corporate income tax under the VAT regime
April 22, 2013 | BY
clpstaff &clp articles &An Announcement from the SAT finally clarifies whether VAT should be included in the tax base for withholding tax levied on non-resident enterprises
The value added tax (VAT) pilot programme was launched at the beginning of 2012 in Shanghai. Although the programme establishes a basic framework of VAT administration, problems still exist and need to be addressed. For example, how to deal with conflicts between VAT applications and the original business tax (BT) regime.
The Announcement
When it comes to cross-border royalty arrangements, the situation gets complicated. Before the VAT pilot programme, a royalty income derived by a non-tax resident was generally subject to a 5% BT and a 10% withholding tax (WHT). Specifically, in determining the tax basis for WHT, BT was also allowed to be deducted before the new corporate income tax (CIT) regime became effective on January 1 2008. The Circular on Issues Relevant to the Levy and Collection of Enterprise Income Tax on Non-tax-resident Enterprises (关于非居民企业征收企业所得税有关问题的通知) (Circular 130), then provided that no taxes or other charges may be deducted in determining the tax basis of WHT. In other words, BT must be included when calculating WHT. However, under the current calculation of WHT, a new issue arises as to whether VAT, in place of BT, must be included under the programme. (Figure 1 shows the effect of the VAT pilot programme on royalty fees in which the turnover tax surcharges are not considered).
Figure 1: VAT pilot programme and royalty fees
Before 2008 (under the old CIT regime) | Before 2012 (under the new CIT regime) | After 2012 (Under the VAT pilot programme) | |
Royalty fee | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Tax amount (rate) | BT (5%) 5 = 100 × 5% | BT (5%) 5 = 100 × 5% | VAT (6%) 5.66 = 100 / (1 + 6%) × 6% |
WHT - tax basis | 95 | 100 | 94.3 = 100 / (1 + 6%) |
WHT | 9.5 = 95 × 10% | 10 = 100 × 10% | 9.43 = 94.3×10% |
Final allocation of licence fee | |||
Licensee | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Total tax | 14.5 = 5 + 9.5 | 15 = 5 + 10 | 15.09 = 5.66 + 9.43 |
Licensor | 85.5 | 85 | 84.91 |
In response to this issue, on February 19 2013 the State Administration of Taxation promulgated the Announcement on an Issue Relevant to the Payment of Enterprise Income Tax by Non-tax-resident Enterprises Involved in the Pilot Projects for the Levy of Value-added Tax in Place of Business Tax (关于营业税改征增值税试点中非居民企业缴纳企业所得税有关问题的公告) (Announcement 9). The Announcement expressly states that VAT shall not be included in the tax basis of WHT when calculating the WHT applicable to passive income as stipulated by the current PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law (中华人民共和国企业所得税法).
The reasons for this are, in contrast to BT, VAT is an external tax. Under the original VAT regime, the gross amount should have excluded VAT in determining the tax basis for calculating VAT. The other reason is that unlike BT, VAT withheld by a PRC taxpayer may potentially be used as input VAT to offset against the taxpayer's VAT obligations. Announcement 9 is an important step towards harmonising the VAT pilot programme with the BT regime. But it is also only a starting point and there are still calls for further clarification.
Dividends and other passive incomes
Although Announcement 9 refers to passive income derived by non-tax residents, it will not be applicable to every kind of passive income. Apart from royalties, certain kinds of passive income not subject to BT under the BT regime will not be affected. For example, dividends and capital gains of share transfers, which are only subject to WHT when being paid offshore, will not be affected.
Technology licences and related services
Even if classified as a royalty, Announcement 9 does not touch upon technology licences and related services. Under the BT regime, technology licences and related services were exempted from BT, either domestic or cross-border. The VAT pilot programme merely provides that applicable VAT taxpayers may be exempted from technology licences and related services. It is, however, silent as to when a cross-border technology licence occurs. Following the encouragement and the introduction of advanced technology, it is foreseeable that the tax-free treatment will apply to cross-border technology licences. Under this assumption, advanced technology will not be affected by Announcement 9 because it is exempt from tax either under the BT regime or the VAT pilot programme.
Provision of services
Beyond royalties, there are also services that fell under BT before the VAT pilot programme. According to the original BT regime, if either the service provider or the service recipient is located in the PRC, the service will be subject to BT and, if it constitutes a permanent establishment, CIT. After the VAT pilot programme, the service fees shall be deemed as a gross amount that also includes VAT. When determining the tax basis for VAT, VAT itself shall be excluded from the gross amount, turning the gross amount into the tax basis.
Announcement 9 shows that the VAT pilot programme is becoming deeply ingrained and harmonised with the entire PRC tax regime. With such gradual efforts, the VAT pilot program will transform the tax regime more smoothly.
Lawrence Hu, MWE China Law Offices, Shanghai
This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.
A Premium Subscription Provides:
- A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
- A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
- Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
Already a subscriber? Log In Now