Preparing for change: Deloitte PE Interview

October 12, 2012 | BY

clpstaff &clp articles &

Hong Ye and Julie Zhang from Deloitte spoke with David Tring about new rules on PE funds, partnership taxation rules and a typical day in the office



What is the structure of Deloitte's legal team and how do you interact with each other?

Deloitte China is not licensed to practise law so we do not have a legal team. Deloitte China provides audit, consulting, financial advisory, enterprise risk management, and tax services to selected clients and we organise our professionals in these service groups. Our professionals in each service group also have an industry specialisation. One of these specialisations is private equity. Our professionals specialised in private equity and other industries in different service groups work together to provide our PE clients with integrated services. For example, in an M&A deal, we are able to assemble a team of specialists from different service groups to provide a host of services covering the entire cycle of an M&A deal. Our M&A related services range from financial advisory, forensic service, financial due diligence, tax due diligence, commercial due diligence, sale and purchase agreement (SPA) negotiation support, valuation service, post-transaction integration services, tax structuring and audit service for portfolio investment. Our professionals work side by side, leverage each other's knowledge and expertise and work seamlessly as one team to offer the most practical and effective solution to our clients.

What were some of the legislative changes to the PE sector this year in China? How have these reforms affected you?

Several regulations were published over the last 12 months affecting the PE sector. For instance, in November 2011, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) promulgated the Notice on Promoting the Standardised Development of Equity Investment (Notice 2864). Notice 2864 is the first national-level rule governing PE funds. It sets out a number of new standards (such as a PE fund's allowed scope of investment and number of investors) and puts in place a compulsory registration system.

One other recent development is the issuance of Bulletin [2012] No 30 (Bulletin 30) on June 29 2012 by the State Tax Administration. Bulletin 30 provides further guidance on the determination of beneficial owners. By way of background, only beneficial owners are allowed to enjoy reduced withholding tax rates in double tax treaties. Bulletin 30 provides a new safe harbour rule, according to which certain public listed companies will be treated as beneficial owners automatically. Moreover, where income is received from an agent, the principal may apply to be considered as the recipient of the income, provided that the agent declares it is not the beneficial owner.

Bulletin 30 is important to the PE industry because many funds utilise offshore holding companies to invest into and repatriate income from China. Bulletin 30 provides more clarity as to which recipient may qualify for treaty benefits, but there are still some unresolved issues. So we have been helping several PE clients to apply Bulletin 30 to their specific situations, including having dialogues with the local and national tax authorities.

What is a typical day like for you working in PE at Deloitte?

I (Hong Ye) am an international tax and M&A tax partner in the tax group. My main services to PE clients are to advise on tax efficient acquisition structures and financing structures, conduct tax due diligence, support SPA negotiation, and advise on post-acquisition tax advice relating to integration and business model restructuring.

A typical day working on a project for a PE client may be described as busy. From time to time, it can be intensive or challenging. At the end of the project, I feel a sense of accomplishment (most of the time). In the course of the day, I will be discussing the issues identified by my team during the tax due diligence (sometimes I will do field work myself) and assess the level of risk, discussing a technical issue in a tax structuring paper or brainstorming an idea with the team members or other partners, having conference calls/meetings with the clients to discuss various issues relating to the project, or reviewing our deliverable to the client. I ensure our service is of high quality and our advice/solution is practical and effective and my team is responsive.

What is your outlook for the upcoming year?

We believe that more rules and regulations will be published in the foreseeable future affecting the PE industry.

One possible new regulation could be the detailed partnership taxation rules. Partnership is becoming a popular investment vehicle for both Chinese investors and foreign investors. The previous partnership rules only stipulated the principle that partnership itself is not subject to tax and that income should be allocated and taxed at the partner level

We believe the new rule will further provide guidance on a number of important issues, including (i) whether the character of a partnership's income will pass through to partners, (ii) whether a foreign partner will be treated as having a permanent establishment in China, (iii) how will individual partners be taxed, (iv) what is the character of carried interest, (v) can losses allocated to a partner be used to offset the partners' other taxable income, (vi) which tax bureau has jurisdiction over the partnership and the partners, and (vii) whether the GP or partnership has a withholding obligation over an individual partner's tax liabilities.

Furthermore, we believe that we are likely to see further clarifications on indirect transfers of a Chinese company. SAT will probably grant more leniencies when it comes to intra-group transfers provided that certain conditions are satisfied.

We believe that these potential new regulations will have a significant impact on the PE industry and have been informing, educating and preparing our clients for these potential changes. We have also been communicating with tax authorities on behalf of some PE industry associations to reflect taxpayers' point-of-view on key issues.

What was one of the biggest challenges you have had to overcome this year regarding your work?

It would be advising on the partnership tax treatment for RMB funds. The challenge to find a structure that meets a client's commercial need and is most tax efficient is compounded by the reality that China does not have a well-developed partnership taxation rule today. To advise my PE clients on their RMB fund structures, I had to step into a brand new tax territory where there are limited national rules, guidance and precedence and a lot of inconsistent local tax rules and practice. I had to look beyond the limited partnership taxation rules in China and analyse the principles laid out in the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, the tax treaties or international practice to reach a reasonable position. In advising my clients, I would take into consideration how the Chinese partnership tax rules would develop and assess how these developments may affect my current advice and try to provide the client with a structure that will work well in the future.


Interviewed by David Tring

Further reading:

CSRC allows capital markets competition


This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.

  • A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
  • A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
  • Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact our experienced Sales Professionals at +44 (0)203 868 7546 or [email protected]