China Securities Regulatory Commission, Rules for Determining the Administrative Liability for Acts of Violation of Information Disclosure Laws
中国证券监督管理委员会信息披露违法行为行政责任认定规则
June 01, 2011 | BY
clpstaff &clp articles &Sponsors and investment consultants may be liable for disclosure violations.
Promulgated: April 29 2011
Effective: as of date of promulgation
Main contents: According to the Rules, the failure of parties with an obligation to disclose information in information disclosure documents according to the disclosure requirements on major events or matters stipulated in laws, administrative regulations, rules, normative documents and the business rules of stock exchanges, and the omission of major events shall constitute an act of violation of laws on information disclosure concerning major omission (Article 10).
When determining whether an act constitutes a violation of disclosure laws, objective criteria such as whether the act results in a change in profitability or loss and whether it leads to the satisfaction of the conditions for resumption of stock trading shall generally be considered (Article 12). Subjective criteria such as the attitude of the directors, supervisors and senior management personnel of the company after the disclosure violation act takes place shall also be considered, including whether they continue to cover up the matter and whether they have taken any appropriate remedial measures (Article 13). The personnel responsible for the disclosure violation may submit the company's articles of association, materials that state the division of labour and the performance of duties, the relevant meeting minutes or records as well as other evidence to prove that they are not at fault (Article 16).
When determining the extent of liability of the personnel that violate the laws on information disclosure, the following criteria shall be considered: their role in the course of the disclosure violation, their level of knowledge and attitude; their job positions, specific duties and the performance thereof; and their professional background (Article 19). Where a party raises objection against the matter that is deemed a violation of the disclosure laws and such opposition is recorded in the minutes of the meeting of the board of directors or supervisory board or in business meetings, and has voted against the relevant resolution in the said meetings, he/she shall not be subject to administrative penalty (Article 21).
Where the sponsor, securities service organisation and its personnel fail to act with due diligence, or formulate or issue documents with fraudulent entries, misleading statements or major omissions, the China Securities Regulatory Commission shall determine their liability and impose administrative penalties in accordance with the law (Article 6).
Related legislation: PRC Securities Law (Amended), Oct 27 2005, CLP 2006 No.1 p.31; and PRC Administrative Penalties Law
clp reference:3700/11.04.29promulgated:2011-04-29effective:2011-04-29This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.
A Premium Subscription Provides:
- A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
- A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
- Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
Already a subscriber? Log In Now