Where the road led in 2009

December 08, 2009 | BY

clpstaff &clp articles &

Making predictions is difficult, particularly in the midst of one of history's worst economic downturns. CLP looks back at the most significant points from last year's article, New directions

New directions (2009)

Anti-monopoly

What we said

More lawsuits, closer scrutiny: as Mofcom becomes more confident, it will look more closely at merger filings and learn from criticisms of Inbev/Anheuser Busch. The threat of private actions against foreign companies based on the PRC Anti-monopoly Law (AML) (中华人民共和国反垄断法) will grow, but the courts will be reluctant to accept cases without more guidance from the enforcement agencies.

What happened

There have still been no AML-based cases filed against foreign companies, but several more actions have been taken against Chinese enterprises: Baidu, China Mobile, Sinopec, China Netcom and Chongqing Insurance Association have all been involved in AML litigation. In October, a case filed by Beijing Sursen Electronic Technology Co against Shanda Interactive Entertainment and Shanghai Xuanting Entertainment Information Technology was rejected by the Shanghai No.1 Intermediate People's on evidentiary grounds.

According to competition law specialists, the threat to foreign companies has only grown stronger in the past year. One lawyer told CLP: “Foreign companies were not in the first batch of cases because most cases were brought by individuals as consumers or customers … This doesn't mean foreign companies can be immune.”


Employment

What we said

Emerging rules will create inconsistency: Shortcomings in the implementing regulations for the PRC Employment Contract Law (中华人民共和国劳动合同法) will lead to individual provinces issuing their own rules, creating inconsistencies and challenges. Companies will need to work hard on creating localised internal policies and standard contracts.

What happened

It seems much of this inconsistency has appeared as expected. As Pattie Walsh, head of employment in Asia for DLA Piper, wrote in Australia China Connections magazine recently: “[R]egional variations continue to apply not only in the way the law is adopted and applied formally, but also in the variety of local practices adopted by the local enforcement authorities and agencies.”

Different cities have been applying slightly different rules to issues such as termination of employment contracts, variation of employment conditions, and non-compete agreements.

According to several employment lawyers, Shanghai issued “a very controversial reading on when an employee is entitled to an open-term contract” which is “completely out of step with the rest of the country”.

“They are quite pro-employer, which is a markedly different result from what many had predicted,” says Paul Hastings' Lesli Ligorner.

Joe Deng, a partner of Baker & McKenzie, says: “There will continue to be an uneasy tension between local interpretations and national interpretations.” Under the Chinese system, such tension can only be resolved by the Supreme People's Court issuing an authoritative Opinion or Intepretation. Deng recommends speaking with judges and legislators rather than looking back at previous decisions and treating this as precedent (as would be done in a common law jurisdiction).


Real estate

What we said

Land value appreciation tax must go: A February 2007 tax on land value appreciation is forcing many developers to sell their properties at lower prices; the government has made some other, ineffectual tax cuts, but will need to abolish LVAT in order to improve the market outlook. One specialist predicted the tax would be combined with regular income tax.

What happened

Comments Yongjun Peter Ni of White & Case: “Things have changed a lot since last year. While LVAT revenue accounts for only less than 1.5% of China's total tax revenue, it is unlikely that LVAT will go away anytime soon.” Real estate prices have soared, particularly in Shanghai, and there appears to be no sign of a slowdown. This has led to LVAT being viewed more as a brake to runaway growth, rather than a hindrance to development as it was seen a year ago.

Ni adds that China is also in the process of reviewing all existing taxes on real estate with the plan to consolidate them into a few main taxes. “As part of that process, the long-awaited property tax may be finally introduced,” he says. “The [State Administration of Taxation] officials have clearly stated to the public that LVAT will not be abolished until the real estate tax reform is completed.”

Despite continued strong growth in China, the government is experiencing a tax revenue shortage, and, according to one analyst, may not hit its tax collection target this year. This makes further tax cuts extremely unlikely in the near future.


Bankruptcy

What we said

New law faces severe test: The relatively new PRC Enterprise Bankruptcy Law (中华人民共和国企业破产法) will come under pressure and companies will increasingly turn to consensual methods to deal with their problems. Courts will be reluctant to accept applications until they better understand the Law's implications. Confidence in the new system will remain low and lawyers will need to take novel approaches to dealing with distress.

What happened

Specialist practitioners are all agreed that there has not been widespread use of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law by foreign companies.


Corporate social responsibility

What we said

Be nice: Companies need to take non-binding guidelines on CSR (issued in August 2008) seriously if they want to succeed; CSR will be the key issue in 2009 and companies will need to keep in close touch with the government's aims in order to succeed.

What happened

A new law is apparently being drafted, but no legislation has yet been issued. However, specialists continue to insist that previous non-binding guidelines must be taken seriously by any company wishing to succeed in China. “CSR is now [a] Chinese government priority to the point where you are blacklisted in some provinces if you do not engage with the community,” says one CSR manager.


Taiwan

What we said

Cross-straits ties will keep lawyers busy: A financial industry memorandum of understanding focusing on business law will be signed. This will lead to a surge of mainland investment onto the island, increasing demand for lawyers' services in key areas such as investment, contracts and dispute resolution.

What happened

A framework on financial co-operation was agreed in April, and an MOU was finally signed on November 16 (taking effect in mid-January 2010). This paves the way for mainland China banks to establish branches on the island, and Taiwanese banks to upgrade their PRC representative offices to branches or subsidiaries allowing them to accept renminbi deposits. It also allows Chinese qualified domestic institutional investors (QDIIs) access to the Taiwan stock market.

The Taiwan stock exchange rose sharply after the signing was announced, but dropped again the next day as realism set in. The MOU is not very detailed, and many commentators have suggested no practical benefits will result from it until a more significant economic cooperation framework agreement (Ecfa) is finalised. The political opposition said the agreement would harm the local finance sector and only benefit Chinese lenders.

Meanwhile, Taiwanese lawyers have mixed opinions about the amount of work that could be generated by improved cross-straits financial co-operation. Some point to the introduction of direct flights between Taipei and Shanghai as being more significant, with one even linking this to improved quality of life and fewer marital problems.

This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.

  • A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
  • A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
  • Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact our experienced Sales Professionals at +44 (0)203 868 7546 or [email protected]