China Awards 2009: Deals of the year
November 02, 2009 | BY
clpstaff &clp articles &The winners of the seven Deal of the year categories at the China Law & Practice Awards 2009
(This article is part of CLP's 2009 China Awards Winners coverage.)
Private equity
WINNER - Sinosteel/Midwest
Firms
| |
Deacons
| Sinosteel
|
Hardy Bowen
| Midwest
|
Minter Ellison
| Midwest
|
Mallesons Stephen Jaques
| China Eximbank
|
This deal was the first hostile takeover of an overseas entity by a Chinese state-owned enterprise, but that doesn't begin to do justice to its complexity. Involving mostly Australian law issues, Sinosteel was subject to a number of regulatory restrictions including acquiring approval from the Australian Takeover Panel before launching its bid. The deal was extraordinarily complicated and very messy involving a number of FIRB applications to satisfy foreign ownership restrictions. And Sinosteel had to defeat an alternative bid from Murchison Metals. Given that the deal kept changing, counsel had to work around the clock on a lot of documentation and structuring issues. Despite this, it was all completed in a relatively short timeframe.
FINALISTS
China Merchants Bank/Wing Lung Bank
China Minmetals/OZ Minerals
China Unicom/China Netcom
Shanda Interactive/Hurray!
Shanghai Electric/Shanghai Power Transmission
Private equity
WINNER - Blackstone/Bluestar
Firms
| |
Skadden
| China National BlueStar
|
Zhong Lun Law Firm
| China National BlueStar
|
Commerce & Finance Law Offices
| China National BlueStar
|
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
| The Blackstone Group
|
Fangda Partners
| The Blackstone Group
|
Paul Hastings
| The Blackstone Group
|
As the largest FDI in China in 2008, and the largest private equity investment in China ever, this deal made a lot of headlines. Acquiring a 20% stake for US$600 million, Blackstone's investment in Bluestar was the PE firm's first in China. But it was also the largest foreign investment in a Chinese company in a non-IPO context, and the first time that a PE fund had bought into a Chinese SOE without a planned exit. Structurally, the deal was complex as previous structures – such as preferred shares, preferred convertibles, or a JV – could either not be used or had to be ruled out due to Blackstone wanting a stake. In the end Blackstone acquired common shares in Bluestar, with the deal taking a long time to gain government approval.
FINALISTS
China Vanadium Titano-Magnetite Mining pre-IPO financing
Impress/Beijing Xinmei
Jewel Crown Series A financing
Natural Beauty Bio-Technology privatisation
Olympus/Zhongwang International Group
Zoomlion/CIFA S.p.A.
Restructuring
WINNER - Peacemark
Firms
| |
Allen & Overy
| Peacemark
|
Fried Frank
| Chow Tai Fook Group
|
Lovells
| Ferrier Hodgson
|
Mallesons Stephen Jaques
| ABN Amro
|
Luxury watch manufacturer, distributor and retailer Peacemark entered into provisional liquidation on September 11 2008 after the company was unable to reassure creditors of its strength. Within two months, counsel had expeditiously restructured the company by way of Chow Tai Fook Group's US$65 million acquisition of retail operations and companies in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Switzerland that were within the ambit of the Hong Kong insolvency regime. The deal represents the first and largest cross-border corporate rescue and restructuring in China/ Hong Kong announced and completed since the financial turmoil.
FINALISTS
Dongfang Electric Corporation
Sanda Kan
Shanghai Electric
Shui On Land
Debt and equity-linked
WINNER - Sino-Forest Corporation
Firms
| |
Linklaters
| issuer
|
Aird & Berlis
| issuer
|
Jingtian & Gongcheng
| issuer
|
Appleby
| issuer
|
Commerce & Finance Law Offices
| initial purchasers
|
Davis Polk & Wardwell
| initial purchasers
|
Toronto-listed commercial tree plantation operator Sino-Forest Corporation, which operates its business principally in China through numerous non-PRC intermediary holding subsidiaries and PRC operating subsidiaries, raised US$345 million through a Rule 144A/Regulation S offering. The deal used US-style terms but various changes were made to tailor such terms to the situation of the issuer. For example, the tenor of the notes was extended over five years to address a Canadian withholding tax issue. And certain terms, such as the “events of default” covenant, were made tighter to ensure parity between note holders and holders of the issuer's 2004 high yield bonds (the issuer had not done any US offering since mid-2004).
FINALISTS
China Medical Technologies
Greentown China
Shanda Interactive Entertainment
The Hong Kong and China Gas Company
Equity
WINNER - Solarfun Power
Firms
| |
Shearman & Sterling
| issuer
|
Maples and Calder
| issuer
|
Grandall Legal Group
| issuer
|
Davis Polk & Wardwell
| placement agent
|
Solarfun Power was able to access the capital markets during a very volatile period because its offering was structured by counsel as a “dribble-out offering”, also known as a “controlled equity offering”. This type of offering, which is not even common in the US, was the first deal of its kind in Asia. The issuer first puts up a universal shelf by filing a registration statement with the SEC. The issuer and the investment bank, acting as an agent, enter into a sales agreement in which the agent agrees to use its best efforts to sell up to a certain amount of shares. The agent conducts due diligence periodically but, unlike a typical shelf offering, no bring-down comfort letter or legal opinions are delivered with each sale. This allows an issuer that is not otherwise able to sell a large block of shares to be constantly in the market, selling through the agent.
FINALISTS
Changyou.com
China South Locomotive & Rolling Stock Corporation
China Zhongwang Holdings
Lumena Resources
Real Gold
Renhe Commercial Holdings
Project finance
WINNER - Central Asia-China gas line
Firms
| |
Baker & McKenzie
| CNPC
|
GRATA
| CNPC
|
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
| Asia Trans Gas
|
Clifford Chance
| CDB
|
King & Wood
| BOC
|
China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) was faced with a myriad of issues in trying to complete a project that spanned Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, involved two project companies, two financings, but only one sponsor. This US$11 billion pipeline project raised all sorts of challenges under Kazakh and Uzbek law. For example, Uzbek law required 50% of the proceeds from the offtake agreement to be converted into local currency, so a waiver had to be obtained. Although the facility agreements were governed by English law, the local security documents were controlled by Kazakh and Uzbek law. Lenders had to structure around CNPC's decision to provide a guarantee for some of the risk though not the political risk.
FINALISTS
ADB/Standard Chartered energy efficiency programme
CDB-Poland UMTS network
China Guangdong Nuclear Power
China-Kazakhstan pipeline financing
Dalkia Group financing
Energy & natural resources
WINNER - China Oilfield Services/Awilco Offshore
This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.
A Premium Subscription Provides:
- A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
- A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
- Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
Already a subscriber? Log In Now