Do Clinical Drug Trials Trigger Imminent Infringement?

November 01, 2007 | BY

clpstaff

By Landy Jiang and Xiao [email protected]; [email protected] infringement is a new concept for China and has recently been introduced into Chinese…

By Landy Jiang and Xiao Li

Imminent infringement is a new concept for China and has recently been introduced into Chinese Law. It brings China into line with the relevant provisions of the WTO agreement of Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) of 2001. Article 61 of the Patent Law allows a patent holder to seek an order requiring an apparent infringer to suspend its activities and preserve the relevant property in cases where there is reasonable evidence of ¡¥imminent infringement¡¦ that will cause ¡¥irreparable harm¡¦. Although Article 63 does provide exemptions for scientific research and experimental use, drug companies insist that ¡¥experimental use¡¦ must be construed narrowly. They argue that ¡¥imminent infringement¡¦ occurs as soon as experiments are directed towards a clear commercial purpose. This includes the production or use of a patented drug for clinical experiments in order to obtain regulatory approval. In this article we examine the reasons as to why clinical trials are exempted from liability for patent infringement.

This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.

  • A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
  • A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
  • Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact our experienced Sales Professionals at +44 (0)203 868 7546 or [email protected]