CHINESE COMPANIES CONTINUE TO FACE TRADE DIFFICULTIES
October 01, 2007 | BY
clpstaffFrom Easy-Bake Ovens to pet food, US consumers are following through with their objections to unsafe products, and legal practitioners say that Chinese…
From Easy-Bake Ovens to pet food, US consumers are following through with their objections to unsafe products, and legal practitioners say that Chinese companies will have to bear some of the costs. Class actions have been filed against Mattel and Fisher-Price, and costs for lead-poisoning tests and punitive damages awarded by US courts may also filter back to producers.
According to Simon Luk of international law firm Heller Ehrman, Chinese manufacturers are now facing the consequences of a lack of prior planning to ensure their products have been rigorously tested according to US standards. With claims that purchased products are not meeting safety requirements now starting to come in from US companies, Chinese manufacturers which have sold below-standard products are experiencing difficulties in fending off liability. ¡°Unfortunately, you don't have much of a choice when you sell to the US,¡± he says. ¡°If you sell to the US, you will be sued.¡±
While questions of which standards to use are typically associated with contractual obligations, strict liability spans the borders much more easily, as tort claims in the US can be easily enforced against the assets of manufacturers, wherever they are located. US accounts held by Chinese companies can be directly charged by way of court order, while indemnity claims by toy retailers can entail additional costs.
While design flaws account for around 90% of recalled products, contributory negligence is often an issue in such cases, depending on the indemnity language in the contracts. However, as is common practice among manufacturers in China, purchase agreements are often not even written down, making such situations even more difficult to resolve.
Wilfred Fung, whose law firm Keller and Heckman helps food exporters determine whether their products are in compliance with international standards, says that his clients have faced increasing difficulties in light of similar well-publicized cases.
Fung notes that while cases such as the Mattel recalls are about determining liability, food exporters have been penalized simply because they have produced a similar product to that of another company which caused a scare. One such case involved a client which produced wheat gluten and whose goods were automatically confiscated at port inspection because its type of product was associated with widely-reported problems with pet food.
This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.
A Premium Subscription Provides:
- A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
- A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
- Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
Already a subscriber? Log In Now