Internet Protocol: Cheap Phone Calls to Full Convergence?

May 02, 2001 | BY

clpstaff &clp articles &

China's Killer Application?Internet Protocol (IP) could be China's "killer application", according to Kaili Kan from the Beijing University of Posts &…

China's Killer Application?

Internet Protocol (IP) could be China's "killer application", according to Kaili Kan from the Beijing University of Posts & Telecommunications.

Available over a regular telephone line, one IP application, Voice over IP (VoIP), is expected to take 30% of China's long distance call market this year. VoIP delivers long distance service, for as little as half the price of calls made over the conventional Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) service. In spite of lower charges, providers claim that VoIP is extremely profitable. Enhanced IP services will become available, which will accelerate Chinese communication networks towards a full convergence of voice, video and data transfer services.

Undeniable Attractions

VoIP in China was first publicized when two brothers were arrested in March 1999 for using the internet to provide cheap long distance services to local customers. They succeed in court because there were no regulations banning the provision of such services.

Despite the threat it represented to China Telecom's monopoly over long distance services, the Ministry of Information Industries (MII) granted VoIP operating licenses to China Mobile, China Netcom, Jitong Communications and China Telecom. The latter three were involved in a six month trial of the service across 26 cities. The MII issued the Notice Concerning the Opening Up of China's IP Telephony Business, which granted full VoIP operating licenses to the above telecoms providers. Now, disposable IP cards ranging from Rmb50 to Rmb500 are readily available, and billboards advertising their access numbers dot the nation's skylines.

Foreign Participation Down the Line

VoIP involves the conversion of analogue signals into packets of digital information that are transmitted over the internet and re-converted at the other end. No such service is included in the "Classification of Telecommunications Services" attached to the PRC Telecommunications Regulations (中华人民共和国电信条例)(Telecom Regulations). Basic telecoms services are defined in the Telecom Regulations to mean "the business of providing public network infrastructure, public data transmission and basic voice communications services". VoIP may be considered to be a form of basic telecoms services. If so, foreign investment in VoIP will only be allowed in the cities of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou within three years of China's accession to the WTO, and foreign equity will be initially limited to 25%.

Foreign firms are entering the Chinese market as vendors of IP applications and equipment. In April this year, one US firm announced that it had concluded agreements with the major Chinese telecom providers to provide IP software solutions. The company stated that its products had received Network Access Licenses for Telecommunication Equipment certifications. Reports that China Unicom and China Netcom are planning to build networks based on IP, suggest that similar opportunities for foreign participation may become available.

Beyond the Common Measure

To make these IP dreams a reality, IP service providers may face some regulatory hurdles. Indeed, the revolutionary nature of IP may put it at odds with telecom regulations covering service quality, service standards and billing procedures. The broad availability of enhanced IP services will add further fuel to China's ongoing network convergence debate.

VoIP has a name for poor quality service standards. In an effort to defend its domination of long distance services in China, China Telecom, itself a VoIP provider, placed a series of advertisements questioning the quality of VoIP services.

Articles 39 and 40 of the Telecom Regulations allow users to launch administrative appeals with MII against providers to complain about sub-standard services. Other provisions, such as the new Quality Measures mentioned in last month's bulletin, have affirmed the government's commitment to raise industry standards and protect users' rights.

IP's compliance with prevailing standards might be difficult to gauge if existing methods are used. Conventional network-based measures fail to provide an accurate reading of service standards over IP networks. Quality assessments must be made at the end-user or gateway service level - this requirement being unique to the IP standard. For enhanced IP services, the provision of sufficiently accountable billing practices required under Articles 40, 41 and 74 of the Telecom Regulations, will require the use of new metering technologies now available.

Setting the Standard

The IP standard that providers elect to use may also bring complications. The year 2001 may be remembered as the "year of standards" for communications. Authorities have expressed the desire to set national standards for digital television, Chinese domain names and e-commerce operating platforms, and are attempting to harmonize TD-SCDMA, China's own third generation mobile phone standard, with the more universal TD-CDMA.

The most widely used IP standard, H.323, is being challenged by newer versions of the protocol. If authorities become involved in the promotion or strict designation of any one IP standard, concerns as to its inter-operability with other standards being developed and used internationally, may arise.

Converging on a Common Goal

The greatest influence IP will have in China will be on the convergence issue. Pursuant to the restrictions outlined in the Strengthening the Administration of the Construction of Broadcast Television Cable Networks Opinion, cable operators are banned from offering conventional PSTN services, while telecom operators are banned from providing cable services (CATV).
Enhanced IP applications will not only allow for voice, video and data transfers over PSTN and CATV networks, but also allow for a range of hybrid services.

The wide availability of enhanced IP services may not only prompt authorities to resolve the convergence issue, but is so pliable that it may make it difficult for regulators to confine operators or users to any single value-added service, or set of services set out in the Telecom Regulations list.

If enhanced IP services can match the impact that VoIP has already made on the Chinese communications sector, the consequences for the industry as a whole promise to be significant.

By Nancy Leigh,
Baker & McKenzie, Hong Kong

This premium content is reserved for
China Law & Practice Subscribers.

  • A database of over 3,000 essential documents including key PRC legislation translated into English
  • A choice of newsletters to alert you to changes affecting your business including sector specific updates
  • Premium access to the mobile optimized site for timely analysis that guides you through China's ever-changing business environment
For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact our experienced Sales Professionals at +44 (0)203 868 7546 or [email protected]